In fact, the most
surprising item to emerge at the press conference was the release of
Turkstat's new population projections up to the year 2075. These new
projections did not reveal anything new about the dynamics of Turkey's
demographics, but they did contain new insight on the debate over the problem
of the country's aging population. Turkstat's basic figures regarding total
population in the long run assume a decreased fertility rate, moving from 2.0
to 1.65 in 2050, when the population will reach its peak at 93 million. The
total population number is expected to decline to 89 million in 2075, and the
share of the population that is older than 65 will continue to increase. This
share from an actual 11.3 percent will rise to 14.9 percent in 2023, to 21.7
percent in 2035, to 32.9 in 2050 and 47.9 in 2075, which means close to half
of the population will be made up of seniors.
No doubt that the
aging population will turn into a serious problem within two decades. The new
population projections confirm my recent estimations (see my column of Feb.
4, “Fears of aging population”). The adverse effects of an aging population
for the country like high public expenditure versus insufficient revenue will
start to become devastating for the economy in the second half of the 2030s.
From now until 2035 the population between 15 and 64, the working age
population, will increase by 9 million, while the senior population will
increase by 7 million. Nevertheless, even if we assume a high labor force
participation rate – 80 percent, for example – the increase in the workforce
will be just 7 million. That means that through 2040 the increase in the
number of seniors will surpass the increase in the number of people added to
the workforce.
Some suggested
solutions to the problem of an aging population, like a more rapid increase
in the number of working women or the accelerated increase in labor
productivity through better education and technological progress, but they
will not remedy the situation. We do, however, have to implement the
aforementioned solutions if we want to have sustainable economic growth that
is close to the potential growth rate of the Turkish economy, estimated at
around 5 percent. The suggested solutions are necessary in order to prevent
problems like unemployment and poverty from becoming serious headaches in the
near future.
Can the three-child
policy be part of the solution? I wrote in my Feb. 4 article that “more
children can be part of the solution if an efficient way to reverse the
decreasing fertility rate is found.” Well, the TurkStat projections show that
even if this reverse occurs it will not be very helpful in avoiding the
adverse effects of an aging population. Indeed, TurskStat looked at two
alternative scenarios in population dynamics. In the first scenario the
fertility rate starts to increase steadily from its actual level of 2.0 to
2.5, and in the second projection it would move to 3.0 by 2050. However, the
extra number of people of working age by 2035 only amounts to 500,000 in the
first scenario and 750,000 in the second. Obviously, the contribution of the
three-child policy towards solving the aging population problem would remain
very modest. Instead of trying to convince families to have more children
through financial incentives it could be wiser to spend the money on
education, for example.
So, what to do? The
more I think about this aging issue the more I am convinced that the only
solution is to bring in a foreign labor force in the 2030s. What kind of
workers and from where? Let me provide a reminder that Turkey has
been importing labor from its neighbors since the 1990s, but the numbers are
a state secret!
|
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder