Most readers would perhaps prefer I write again about the possible
outcomes of March 30, but I already said what I think about them. I will just
reiterate the main points of my personal thoughts on the electoral debate
before discussing an assessment of the Turkish economy made last Saturday by
Finance Minister Mehmet Şimşek. I think this assessment is worth being
discussed, whatever the final result of March 30 may be.
|
VPM Babacan & FM Şimşek, trying to be realistic |
To be brief, I think that on March 30, for the future of our democracy as
well as for economic stability, a sizable fall in the Justice and Development
Party's (AKP) share of votes is crucial. I do not expect a clear defeat of
the ruling party for many reasons. Nevertheless, a share of votes at around
40 percent nationally seems plausible to me, and this outcome would be
sufficient to put in motion new political dynamics for getting the country
out of the nightmare in which it is living nowadays.
As for the finance minister, what he said last Saturday at the Uludağ
Summit, a kind of local Davos Summit, goes beyond the impacts of the current
political tension on the economy. Mr. Şimşek spoke on four points: current
account deficit (CAD), budget performance, interest rates and economic
growth. The key points of his speech were growth performance and, to some
extent, the actual interest rate level. So, let's start with those.
The finance minister claimed, "Maintaining [key] interest rates at
just over 11 percent while the inflation rate is above 8 percent is a great
success.” Alright! Due to the new monetary stance of the US Federal Reserve,
expected real interest rates increased in developing countries, including
Turkey. Given the slow but determined increase of the US Treasury Bond's
interest rates and given the increased risk premiums for Turkey -- thanks to
the authoritarian approach of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan regarding
the biggest graft scandal of the republican era -- the actual interest rate
level might be revealed as insufficient to stabilize the exchange rate and
the inflation rate. What I understand when our finance minister says “great
success” is that the central bank could be obliged to increase its policy
rate in the near future. I'll let you guess what might be the reaction of our
prime minister, the greatest enemy of high interest rates.
The nominal and particularly the real interest rates are much higher
nowadays than before, and this is, of course, not good for domestic demand.
However, before the interest rate could increase, the AKP government took
some restrictive measures on the use of consumer loans. It is aiming to
discourage the import of consumption goods as well as take control of
domestic demand. These measures started to have their effects felt in
February. Şimşek said that businessmen are not happy with these measures, but
the government had to take them because of the necessity to decrease the CAD.
Finally, high interest rates coupled with restrictions on bank loans are
expected to lower economic growth. Mr. Şimşek did not make any prediction
about growth perspectives in Turkey, but he admitted that “developing
countries have entered a period of low growth and the next decade will not be
better than the last decade.”
Nevertheless, Mr. Şimşek implicitly recognized that the growth rate will
be lower than the planned 4 percent in the medium term, since he confessed
that it would be very difficult to reach budget targets this year because of
lower tax receipts due to weak domestic demand. The only good news he pointed
out is the decreasing CAD, thanks to low domestic demand, low economic growth
and decreasing imports; exports will receive an extra push due to a moderate
revival in the European market. Well, given the finance minister's summary of
the economy, what may be said regarding the AKP rule?
At least two things: First, once low economic growth becomes apparent so
close to the general elections, Erdoğan will strongly react to the tight
monetary policy as well as to the loan restrictions, breaking the already
fragile balance existing between him and those who govern the economy.
Second, the low growth rate, around 3 percent, will start to show its
adverse effects on the social conditions of the poor.
|
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder