Mr. Çağlayan then expressed his approach to economic
policies: “From now on, we must step on the accelerator. … Each year we must
grow by 6 percent. The way to reach this target is through expansion, not
contraction. There is no need to be cautious on interest rates. They should
be lowered.”
In my column of Feb. 11 (“Worries on economic growth”), I
wrote: “… I think the available information summarized above is enough to
allow me to express some reflections on an important consequence of low
growth. Further loosening monetary policy would risk jeopardizing the 5
percent inflation target. If the Central Bank maintains its actual stance,
the already existing signals of an upturn in unemployment would become more
perceptible. This will increase, for sure, the political pressures on the
central bank's management.” I was not mistaken. Economic policies have
arrived at a crossroad. The soft landing that was desired did not occur. The
landing was rather hard, as the 2012 growth rate is expected to certainly
fall below 3 percent.
That said, Mr. Çağlayan is mistaken in believing that low
growth is responsible for increasing unemployment. As I explained in my
column on Saturday, despite the low growth rate, Turkish corporations and the
state created lots of jobs last year, to the degree that the growth rate of
employment exceeded that of gross domestic product (GDP). Unemployment is
rising not because of insufficient employment but because of a strong growth
of the labor force, particularly in the numbers of women.
I believe these anomalies cannot maintain themselves, at
least if economic theory and common sense prevail. I am afraid that Mr.
Çağlayan, who hopes to see better figures in the coming months, risks being
disappointed. If GDP growth maintains its pace at around 3 percent, rising
employment will unavoidably decelerate. Even in the case of a deceleration in
the growth of the labor force, I believe we should still expect rising
unemployment.
Unemployment is indeed the main threat to economic
stability. I agree with Mr. Çağlayan that growth should be accelerated. The 6
percent target announced by the economy minister is out of range, but 4
percent is achievable. This could also be just enough to calm the worries
regarding rising unemployment. But how? This is the critical question
economists are asking themselves nowadays. The answers vary. The central bank
and Treasury are confident that the 4 percent growth will come partly from
external demand and partly from domestic demand. Let me remind you that last
year domestic demand did not contribute at all to growth. However, the
central bank and some economists do not think that radical changes in
economic policies are needed.
Some others, like Mr. Çağlayan, defend the argument that
further loosening in monetary policy and the depreciation of the Turkish lira
are necessary. At the moment, no one defends the loosening of fiscal
discipline; Mehmet Şimşek, the minister of finance, announced last Friday
that budget performance for the first two months is better than that of last
year. This is good news. But if the state of the budget is revealed to be
insufficient to revive domestic demand and/or exports fall further behind
imports, what will happen to the moderately expansionist monetary policy and
to the moderately tight fiscal policy?
Personally, I think that there is no room for further
lowering interest rates. The real interest rate has already come down to as
low 1 percent, and the central bank is neither able nor willing to lower it.
A limited depreciation of the Turkish lira will certainly aid growth, but the
way to realize that process is not evident in the slightest. Thus it remains
in the hands of fiscal policy. Let's hope that growth will resume in the
coming months, just enough to stop the rise of unemployment and just enough
to limit the unavoidable increase of the current account deficit.
|
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder