|
Dangerous tension for Turkey |
Admittedly, the shock
is not peculiar to Turkey.
As assessed by Bloomberg, “the game seems to be over” for the emerging
markets amid the changing stance of the Fed regarding its future monetary
policy. This changing stance was part of the game. If the US economy
stays on the path to recovery, the Fed will be stopping its cheap, rampant
liquidity policy. These expectations cause, quite naturally, capital outflows
from emerging economies, particularly from those considered most fragile.
There is no surprise
in this new state of affairs. However, the Turkish economy has felt the
effects more than others. Why? I think there are two main reasons: The first
is the pre-existing weaknesses of the Turkish economy. Readers are certainly
aware of these weaknesses, but let's recall them briefly. The current account
deficit (CAD) to gross domestic product (GDP) rate is 6 percent, which is
still high and, moreover, is increasing because of a recent revival in
domestic demand along with sluggish exports and increasing imports.
Inflation, at roughly 6.5 percent, is over its target of 5 percent and the
GDP growth rate is below 4 percent. This state in which we find
macroeconomics is already alarming and necessitates a different policy
response than the current one.
In this setting, the
Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government very poorly managed the Gezi Park
crisis. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan preferred to accuse the “interest
rate lobby” as well as his Western allies of being responsible for the Gezi Park
protests.
As I have already put
forth in previous articles, this irrational attitude causes worry among
investors regarding the ability of AK Party to properly manage an open market
economy in troubled times. This is, I believe, is the second reason why the
Turkish economy has been affected more than others. When the first shockwave
due to domestic tension struck a week ago, Central Bank of Turkey Governor Erdem Başçı stated his belief
that the Gezi Park events are responsible for
one-third of the market-related problems. Given fact that the AK Party responded
harshly to European criticism over Gezi, thereby provoking a crisis in the
harmonization process, the second shock certainly amplified the drift in the
main macroeconomic indicators.
This is not the first
time that the Turkish economy has faced a sudden stop concerning capital
flows. In these circumstances, the central bank would react by increasing
interest rates to stop the bleeding and regain control over the rapid
depreciation of the Turkish lira. This policy would bring about a new
equilibrium of relatively lower but balanced growth and a competitive
exchange rate.
This time is
different, for two reasons at least. The rebalancing operation had already
failed and in order to increase economic growth, which had dropped to 2
percent, the central bank and the government were trying painfully to revive
domestic demand through rather loose monetary policy. Expected real interest
rates were falling and this was already a hotly debated issue. The external
shock occurred at a time -- and this is the second reason -- when Turkey needed
to keep investor confidence strong in terms of political and economic
stability.
What is happening now?
Conspiracy theories and the tension with the EU undermined this confidence and
the sword of Damocles is hanging over the central bank, which risks being
accused of being part of the interest lobby if it reacts by increasing
interest rates. The upper limit of the interest corridor has been lowered to
6.5 percent, the rate at which the central bank provides short-term loans to
banks, whereas the bond yields now exceed 8 percent. So, the central bank is
trying desperately to stop the devaluation of the Turkish lira by selling
dollars.
Obviously, the Turkish
economy now seriously faces a risk of recession. President Abdullah Gül said
recently that “building a reputation can take 10 years, but this reputation
can be lost in 10 day.” The Central Bank of Turkey had painstakingly built a
solid reputation over the past several years and now risks losing it if it
does not quickly tighten its monetary policy. But, above all, the AK Party
rulers must find a way to radically change their minds if they do not want to
have an economic recession on their hands.
|
Dear Mr. Gürsel
YanıtlaSilWhy is the depreciation of the TL and the capital outflows such a problem? Would the capital outflow not cause a decrease in imports and a weak TL help the exports, so that the CAD would finally come down?