İstanbul will, hopefully, have a new
airport in 2019, replacing the current Atatürk Airport
that has reached the limits of its capacity. But do not worry. The new
airport will have enough space, maybe more than necessary. Indeed, for its
opening an annual capacity of 90 million passengers is projected, whereas İstanbul
Atatürk Airport handled 45 million passengers
last year. Then, there are plans to increase the capacity of the new airport
to 120 million and even 150 million in a third stage. If these ambitious
plans are realized, the new airport will probably be the biggest in the
world.
|
|
Istanbul mega airport: Too big or not? |
This very ambitious
project raised, as expected, a heated debate in the Turkish media regarding
environmental concerns and profitability, all the more after Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, a great lover of mega projects, presented it as one of
the most important endeavors of Turkey under the Justice and Development
Party (AK Party) rule in terms of capacity and tender price. Indeed, a few
weeks ago the new airport was awarded to a consortium of Turkish firms under
a build-operate-transfer (BOT) system for 22 billion euros to be paid to the
Turkish Treasury over 25 years.
On Friday, the Bahçeşehir University Center
for Economic and Social Research (Betam) published a research brief which I
co-authored which might help in seeing things more clearly in this hot
debate. Betam's research tries to answer two questions: Are the projected
capacities realistic and could the new airport be profitable, taking into
consideration the high tender price? Before going through the airport
mathematics, let me give you Betam's answers: If the Turkish economy grows
around its potential in the next 25 years, the projected capacities do not
seem to be the product of a megalomaniac mindset. But if growth rates lag a
little behind potential growth, even the 120 million passengers target is
seen as too optimistic. The answer to the second question is, in fact,
included in the first answer. If the passenger forecasts are not realized,
the estimated operating profits will be far from compensating the rent to be
paid to the Treasury together with the installments of the bank loan.
Thus, the critical point
is economic growth. Betam forecasted passenger increases based on the results
of a slowdown taking into consideration population increase, the rate of
economic growth and ticket prices, the first two parameters being the most
influential. Population increase is easy to forecast. To estimate the growth
rate Betam considered two growth scenarios. In the first one, it set growth
at 5 percent for the next seven years, which is the admitted potential growth
rate for the Turkish economy, then 4 percent until 2030, and, finally, 2
percent up until 2043. In the second scenario, should Turkey be unable to
implement the necessary reforms in order to secure its potential economic
growth, the growth rates used in the forecasts are 4 percent, 3 percent and
1.5 percent, respectively.
In the first scenario,
a 90 million capacity in the first stage seems more than reasonable and 150
million passengers would be achieved around 2030. However, if the Turkish
economy continues to be trapped in a low growth regime -- and it seems to be
the case actually -- the slightly lower growth rates would have a decisively
adverse impact on the number of passengers. Indeed, in the second scenario
the forecasted number of passengers hardly reaches 70 million in 2019 and a
capacity of 120 million would be fully utilized only in the 2040s. Let me
underline once again that the necessity of a mega airport for Istanbul depends
crucially on the future growth performance of the Turkish economy.
The profitability
issue is, quite logically, linked to the number of passengers and flights,
given the agreed service prices in the tender. Taking as benchmarks the
financial information of Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport,
the busiest in the US with about 90 million passengers, as well as those of
the Atatürk and Sabiha Gökçen airports, Betam's estimates show that in the
optimistic scenario, cumulative losses appear until 2030 because of rent and
loan installments. But these losses are largely compensated for after this
thanks to large profits. Nevertheless, in the second scenario, the
profitability of the mega airport might be very problematic unless the
consortium succeeds in raising enough non-operational revenue from real
estate developments in the extensive area (7,400 hectares) provided to the
new airport.
|
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder