For weeks I have been trying to explain in this column why the Turkish
Central Bank must increase its interest rates.
|
|
I wrote that the causes of the exchange rate drift were mostly to be
found in the current political crisis, but a reaction from the central bank
was needed because the wait-and-see policy has been risking further deepening
concerns with respect to its independence, as well as increasing the risk of
recession. Last week, the Monetary Policy Committee (PPK) contented itself
with a very timid reaction that did not convince economic actors at all. One
week later, the PPK met urgently and decided to sharply increase its various
interest rates.
I will later support the meaning of this move and its implications, but
the first question to be answered is why the PPK did not make this decision
one week earlier. The first inflation report of the year was published last
Tuesday and shows clearly that Turkey, as of the end of December, has widely
diverged from other emerging markets. Indeed, Turkey's Country Default Spread
(CDS) premium (the risk premium) as well as the depreciation of the Turkish
lira have reached high levels compared to Brazil, South Africa and Indonesia.
The leading market interest rate of Treasury bonds reached 11 percent, well
above the de facto interest rate of the central bank at 7.75 percent and at
the upper limit of the interest rate corridor. This was a clear signal that
monetary policy was unable to determine the market rates. In other words,
enough information was available for the central bank to convince its
management to strongly react to these facts by using its interest rate as a
weapon, even more since massive sales in US dollars have been revealed as
inefficient to prevent the drift of the Turkish lira.
The central bank's management missed this opportunity and caused deep
concerns regarding its ability to operate independently, disregarding the
political pressures. So, what happened within a week? I wrote last Tuesday in
this column that Ali Babacan, the deputy prime minister in charge of economic
affairs, knowing the crucial value of the central bank's independence and
knowing also that the central bank may be obligated to react much more
aggressively if the depreciation of the lira persists, has been striving to
thwart political pressures of some ministers, particularly Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Mr. Babacan said, “It is absolutely wrong to violate
the independent sphere of the central bank.” And I add, “I hope Mr. Babacan
will be heard.”
It seems that he has been heard, but with some delay. This does not mean
that the existing furious debate within the government regarding monetary and
exchange rate policies has definitely been terminated. On Tuesday evening,
before an unscheduled meeting of the PPK, Mr. Erdoğan made a very critical
statement. In response to question on the interest rate policy, he underlined
the independent status of the central bank and said that it will make its own
decision. Nevertheless, he could not allow himself to add that he is against
an interest rate increase and that, in the event of an increase, the central
bank management will be responsible for the consequences. We know the
outcome. The PPK increased all its interest rates in a dramatic fashion from
425 to 550 basis points. At first glance, this increase seemed a very harsh
one. That was my first reaction on Tuesday at midnight. However, the devil
being in the details, I nuanced my first reaction when I read in the morning
a short communiqué from the PPK. In fact, the central bank decided to use its
policy rate instead of its overnight lending rate, which was at 7.75 percent.
Since the policy rate has increased from 4.50 to 10 percent now, the central
bank's lending rate increased only by 225 basis points.
Now, we have two questions to be answered. First, will this harsh
reaction be able to decrease the fever of the exchange rate? I think so, but
the evolution of political uncertainties must also be taken into
consideration. The second question is about the consequences of the interest
rate response. In fact, this is a false question. The right one is: What
might be the consequences of the interest rate response compared with those
of a deeply depreciated Turkish lira? I will try to develop my answer this
Saturday, but the faithful readers of this column know my essential point of
view: The consequences of a deeply depreciated Turkish lira would have been
worse.
|
30 Ocak 2014 Perşembe
The central bank did what it had to do
Kaydol:
Kayıt Yorumları (Atom)
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder